Canadian Energy Workers Association v. ATCO Electric 2018 CanLII 74202 (AB GAA) July 2018: The arbitral tribunal found that a violation of a notice of collective bargaining constitutes a violation of the union`s representation rights. The committee noted that the dismissal provisions have value and that a violation could justify a claim for compensation: “Claims have value for both workers and unions. Violations of these termination claims may justify damages for the loss of value offered by these claims” (pages 13 and 14). In this case, a declaratory decree was issued. Importantly, the Panel also recognized that there may be circumstances in which it could find a remedy, even for pecuniary benefits (page 12). ALRB SUMMER/AUFA (Athabasca University) SETTLEMENT SUMMARY CASE (also karen) – ALRB decision to dismiss unfair labour practices complaints against the union in a post-secondary university environment Please report your traffic by notifying your user agent to include company-specific information. Karen`s TFW case (the first TFW case in Canada) and the HSAA case on disclosure in CDI cases and the employer`s ongoing obligations in CDI situations. Unauthorized attempts to upload information and/or modify information to any part of this website are strictly prohibited and subject to prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 (see Title 18 U.S.C §§ 1001 and 1030).

By using this website, you agree to security monitoring and auditing. For security reasons and to ensure that the public service remains accessible to users, this government computer system uses network traffic monitoring programs to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or modify information, or otherwise cause damage, including attempts to deny service to users. 2017 IBEW 1007 v. Epcor – ABCA Confirms the Application and Scope of Section 7(2) of the Alberta Human Rights Act with respect to Group Benefit Plans HSAA v. AUPE – Application Decision for Determination ALRB 2014 (Therapy Assistants) Paulette`s recent CEWA case on ABC AHS v. HSAA Union Notification and Compliance – 2018 Judicial Review Decision Confirming the Reinstatement of an EPA Paramedic v. EPS – 2017 abca (S.P.) Decision Determining the Limits of Service Restrictions Imposed on Police Officers Note that this policy may change if the SEC manages to SEC.gov to ensure that the Website operates effectively and remains available to all users. If a user or application submits more than 10 requests per second, other requests from the IP address may be limited for a short time. Once the request rate has fallen below the threshold for 10 minutes, the user can continue to access the content on SEC.gov. This SEC practice is designed to limit excessive automated searches to SEC.gov and is not intended or should not affect anyone browsing the site SEC.gov. Canadian National Federation of Independent Unions affecting Parkland Community Living and Supports Society (Re), 2017 CanLII 46719 (AB LRB): The employer provided special needs support and education in several residential facilities and one school. The employer objected to the inclusion of faculty and housing supervision in the bargaining unit.

The Board concluded that there were common skills, tasks and working conditions in all locations, including the school. The Commission concluded that the regulators were not exercising sufficient management functions to justify the exclusion. Supervisors had no effective authority over hiring decisions, written dismissals or disciplinary measures, the handling of complaints, the development of policies or the handling of confidential information. The employer`s objections were dismissed and school staff and housing supervision were included in the bargaining unit. Kelli`s ACP case (HSAA vs. ACP), and also QB`s special case on the obligation for employers to correctly identify allegations of breach of fiduciary duties and confidential information, etc., and possibly the EPA N. Lee ABQB case on time limits for DFR CEWA v. ATCO complaints – April 2018 D&A-Test Judicial Review (yes, a loser, but aren`t they all?) EPA v EPS – 2018 Jones Decision Confirming employer must allow housed employees to apply for other positions in the workplace, subject to unreasonable difficulties For more information, see the SEC`s Privacy and Security Policy. . .

.